When the law now commonly referred to
as “Obamacare” was first debated more than two years ago, I was
strongly opposed to it. I rejected as a matter of principle the idea
of government involvement in healthcare. I did not think that the
government could do anything to help the problems our country faces
regarding affordability and availability of medical care to all. On
the day the law passed Congress and was signed by President Obama I
was attending a business meeting in England. An English colleague
rejoiced at the news, while I expressed serious reservations and
disappointment. She saw it as a small victory that our country
finally took a step to providing medical coverage for all its
citizens. After all, we were the one remaining major industrialized
country that still did not do this. By European standards the
healthcare situation in the United States was simply barbaric. Sure,
they recognized that we have some of the best quality healthcare in
the world, but for significant portions of our population this
remained inaccessible due to costs. At the time I acknowledged the
problems she pointed out but argued that Obamacare and government
involvement in healthcare did not offer a helpful solution.
Today, when the Supreme Court upheld
the healthcare act, I rejoiced. This obvious contradiction can be
explained by the shift in my own viewpoint over the last couple
years. This shift comes from my frustrations with skyrocketing
healthcare costs and the lack of any other realistic proposal to
begin addressing them. It comes also from my growing awareness of the
growing number of people who either have no healthcare insurance or
whose insurance premiums and costs are increasingly burdensome. My
family would be in the latter category. Thankfully we do have health
insurance, but each year our premiums climb and I can only mitigate
that climb by continuing to increase our annual deductible. Our
health insurance premium alone takes a serious bite out of our pay
each month and there is not a thing I can do to reduce it. Even with
that insurance available to us we avoid going to the doctor unless we
really have to because the deductible costs us so much. But again, we
are fortunate in that we at least have some type of coverage.
I recognize now that enacting this law
is a matter of justice. It is a matter of making sure that the most
disadvantaged members of our society do not fall through the cracks.
Those opposed to Obamacare will raise all sorts of arguments against
it. They will rail against the growing infringement of government on
our lives. They will discuss the political impact and a multitude of
other issues. But as this article from Sojourners points out, for
believers these shouldn't be the main issues. As Jim Wallis, the
author of the article states:
“Our bottom line is different. We
don't start with politics, but rather with how these decisions affect
real people.”
As God's people we should be raising
our voices in defense of those who are left behind by our economic
system. We should be looking after those in need. We should not leave
them at the mercy of an impersonal market economy. The market
economy, despite its strong advocates in the conservative political
ranks, is not going to solve the healthcare problems we face. The
market economy doesn't look out for the outcasts of society. It chews
them up, tramples them down and grinds them to dust. We should be
doing all we can to counteract that. It's not a perfect solution by
any means, but this healthcare act takes us a step in the right
direction.
I am not familiar with all the
provisions of the act but from what I understand, as someone who
already has insurance, the impact on me will be minimal. In fact it
may be positive, if it can begin to reign in rising costs. I am
pleased by many provisions of the act such as those described in this
chart.
I no longer share the fear of the
government compelling us to buy health insurance. In fact I do not
understand why we tolerate requirements to purchase insurance for our
vehicles but vehemently resist any suggestion that we be required to
carry insurance for our health. Where are our priorities?
I'm open to changes and improvements in
this law, but I think that lobbying for its repeal would be a huge
step backward. I would love to hear some meaningful proposals from
those who oppose this act. I don't consider healthcare savings
accounts to be a viable option, because they require that you
actually have money to invest in them in the first place. Even if I
were freed entirely from my monthly insurance premiums and put that
entire amount in an HSA, an unlikely possibility, I could easily be
bankrupted by a serious medical problem. So if you oppose Obamacare,
bring some real suggestions to the table, suggestions that look out
for the most needy and disadvantaged in our society. I'd love to hear
some suggestions that see medical care as something other than a
for-profit business. But I suppose that in suggesting this I mark
myself already as radical. I'm okay with that, because I think we
need some radical new ideas. I don't think Obamacare is the final
solution, but I do believe that it is a step in the right direction.
No comments:
Post a Comment