While watching the movie Hancock with
my children the other night – an entertaining though not
outstanding anti-superhero movie – I thought to myself that I would
not want to be a superhero. It seems to me that, regardless of one's
superpower, the hero can never really counteract all the evil in the
world. I don't know of a superhero who can simultaneously be in
multiple places, yet evil acts occur all the time in places near and
far. So how is a superhero to choose which events to respond to and
which ones to ignore? If I had superpowers, this dilemma could
potentially paralyze me. At the very least it would leave me with
enormous feelings of guilt because for every good deed I accomplished
I would know that there were any number of other potential good deeds
I couldn't do.
Although I am not a superhero, I still
wrestle with this dilemma. I am aware of far more situations where I
would like to help than I can possibly respond to. I don't have the
physical, financial, time or other resources to do all the good deeds
that I would like to. I try not to let this paralyze me, choosing to
do that which I am able rather than throwing up my hands in despair,
but at times the burden of what I wish I could do but can't does
weigh on my mind. In some degree I wish I were a superhero so that
perhaps I could at least increase my ability to do good in this
world.
When I feel this burden of my
limitations, perhaps it would benefit me to think again of Jesus.
Although he was God and had potentially all the powers of his deity
(godness) available to him, when he walked the earth he to some
degree limited those powers. Although he healed many people, he
didn't heal them all, neither those who were physically near at hand
nor those at a distant. Was he aware of the sufferings of people
outside of the place he was at any given moment? Did the injustices
of the world weigh on him as he walked the dusty roads? Did the
limitations of his humanity place a heavy burden on his mind and
spirit? I don't see a clear answer to these questions in the Bible.
What I do see is Jesus responding to some needs but not all. Surely
he does not ask more of us than he himself was able to do.
Confronted with my own limitations I
should also remember that I am not alone. I am not the only one who
can respond to the needs of the world, not the only one who can speak
out against injustice and offer healing and comfort to the wounded
and suffering. This job is not mine alone. The body of Christ known
as the Church has been called to this task. In some areas the Church
responds quite well. We give very generously to meet certain needs.
Unfortunately others remain hidden, unknown or simply unpopular. I
think of the response much of the evangelical church in America had
when AIDS first came on the scene. Rather than demonstrating
compassion and care, some chose to judge and condemn. Thankfully we
have seen improvement in this, although I still see too many
instances where AIDS sufferers are treated as pariahs, responsible
for their own misfortune. This is only one example. When it comes to
suffering, need, injustice and other expressions of evil in the
world, is it the place of the Church to judge whether those enduring
evil “deserve” it or not? Or should we simply do all we can to
defeat evil where possible and where not possible to at the very
least offer comfort and assistance to its victims?
I don't want to be a person who lives
content in his own little world, oblivious and unconcerned about the
needs around me and the injustice in the world. I cannot respond to
all of it, but I can respond to some of it. I can ask God to lead me
by the Spirit to know where and how I should act. I can regularly
evaluate my use of my time, energy, finances and other resources and
ask where I might give more. Then, when I have done that which I am
able to do, I need to leave the other things to God and not feel the
pressure to be a superhero. Because even superheros can't address all
the evil in the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment