A few years ago the church I attend
established a number of home groups focused on strengthening our
understanding and application of a biblical worldview. They used a
series entitled The Truth Project (www.thetruthproject.org),
created and supported by Focus on the Family. The series is quite
well done and impressive—convincing in fact. The presenters argue
how a biblical worldview begins with a foundation of certain beliefs
about God, truth and humanity, on which are then built the biblical
view of things such as politics, economics, history, art and a wide
range of other topics. They show this visually as a facade like that
of a classic Greek building, with the foundation supporting columns
on which rests a beam with niches for various topics, all covered by
a roof. I came away from watching the series feeling like I had a
nice grasp of what a biblical worldview looked like. For me there
weren't any particularly new elements, but the series brought them
together in a nice synthesis. The way they present the structure, if
you remove any one element of it, the whole structure faces the
danger of collapse. The direct analogy of course is that our society
is increasingly removing or modifying elements of this biblical
worldview and the whole “house” of our Western Judeo-Christian
culture is now threatened.
Now, some years later, I'm beginning to
question many of the presuppositions and arguments made in this
series. I do not have the full series at hand to review and examine
more critically, so I will not try to argue with specifics from the
series but from general points that they made. First of all, I wanted
to put the word “biblical” in quotation marks every time I used
it in the first paragraph, because I really think this word has
become attached to far too many things. Although she takes the
subject in a somewhat different direction, I credit this post by Rachel Held Evans with stimulating much of my thinking on this issue.
I was raised in a circle that treated
the Bible as God's answer book to everything. It was in essence not
only the book that showed us the path to eternal life, it was the
guidebook to every question, the ultimate key to organizing our
lives. But is that what the Bible really is? Can it realistically
fulfill this role? I rather doubt that at this point. Given that
sincere Christians often disagree (at times vehemently) on key issues
(not just theological), it seems dubious to me that we can speak of a
truly “biblical” understanding of most questions that face us as
humans. Is there really a “biblical” politics? Would that look
more republican, democrat, libertarian or other? Is multi-party
democracy more “biblical” than divine-right monarchy? What about
economics? Many of those around me advocate unhesitatingly for
capitalism as the clear “biblical” economic system. Never mind,
as Evans points out in her article, that this system didn't even
exist in Bible times.
I think that much of what the Truth
Project advocates as a “biblical” worldview is really a classical
Western worldview. Some of it has been influenced by the text of the
Bible, though even in this it derives from a particular
interpretation or set of interpretations. Much of it derives far more
from Greek philosophy than the Bible. Even more it represents a
particular Western cultural worldview than an inherently biblical
one. This is not to say that the Western cultural worldview cannot be
argued for and defended (or argued against and attacked). I am simply
arguing that to assert that this worldview is THE biblical worldview
is erroneous, false, and misleading.
I understand better now why the
advocates of this worldview are afraid. As I said, they see their
worldview very much as a cohesive, interlocking structure. Remove one
piece and the whole building is in danger of collapse. In their minds
this is precisely what is happening in the United States today. (I
dare say that most of those behind the Truth Project would say that
Europe has long ago abandoned this worldview and is now paying the
price.) Therefore out of fear they must try to promote and rebuild
this worldview so that their ship doesn't sink (to switch metaphors).
What is more, since they tie their worldview to their Christian
faith, to see the worldview crumble is to see their faith crumble as
well. No wonder they feel such a strong need to defend it. As Evans
writes in her book Evolving in Monkey Town: “for
fundamentalists, Christianity sits perpetually on the precipice of
doom, one scientific discovery or cultural shift or difficult
theological question away from extinction.”
What if, by contrast, our faith is much
more fluid? I'm not advocating for a completely undefined faith. But
what if our faith is far more adaptive and flexible than we have
tended to perceive it? “Fortunately,” writes Evans in her book,
“the ability to adapt to change is one of Christianity's best
features.” For this reason she describes herself as an
evolutionist, arguing that: “I'm an evolutionist because I believe
that the best way to reclaim the gospel in times of change is not to
cling more tightly to our convictions but to hold them with an open
hand. I'm an evolutionist because I believe that sometimes God uses
changes in the environment to pry idols from our grip and teach us
something new.” I imagine that her use of the word evolutionist
makes some people uncomfortable. It made me uncomfortable until I
understood what she is saying. Then I began to become an evolutionist
as well.
I'm beginning to see faith not simply
as a set of propositions that one must assent to (without, however,
abandoning the idea of absolute, propositional truth) but as a
journey; a journey toward Christlikeness; a journey of discovery in
which God guides and directs us by the written text of the Bible, by
the community of sinner-saints around us and by the agency of his
Holy Spirit. I'm finding there are a lot of people on this journey.
Some might accuse us of abandoning our faith; of making it personal
and subjective. I don't think that is the case, at least not for many
of my fellow sojourners. Rather we are seeking to understand what it
means to be Christ-followers in the modern world, faithful to God's
Word in Jesus Christ in the context of the 21st century. I
guess, like Rachel Held Evans, I have stepped onto the slippery slope. It is not as solid, secure and well-defined as the structure
of the “biblical worldview.” But as she says: “Now, I have to
keep a very close eye on Jesus, as he leads me through deep valleys
and precarious peaks.” Let the journey continue.
No comments:
Post a Comment