Last week I began an exploration of
Genetically Modified Organisms, the corporations that are developing
them and the implications these organisms have for the future of our
food supply. You can read the first two installments of the series
here and here.
Today I want to consider the argument
made by these corporations that the work they are doing will
significantly help to reduce hunger in the world. I'm all for that.
Who wouldn't be? I can't think of a single person who when directly
asked whether he or she would like to reduce or eliminate hunger
wouldn't say yes immediately. Which makes it a very powerful argument
when a corporation tries to promote the use of GMOs. Too give them
the benefit of the doubt, maybe the people running these corporations
really do believe that their genetic modifications will help increase
global food supply. But I'm skeptical.
From the documentary The Future of Food
I learned that several staple food items that we produce in the
United States cannot be sold profitably by farmers. So the government
subsidizes farmers to grow things such as corn and soybeans. Much of
what cannot be sold domestically is then sold or given as food aid to
developing countries. We say we do this because we care about hunger
in the world. As I said before, I'll give us the benefit of the doubt
and agree that we really do want to do the right thing. But here's the
problem. In our efforts to do the right thing, what we're really
doing is simply subsidizing our own farmers while driving local
farmers in developing countries out of business. They cannot compete
with our subsidized imported product. They cannot grow their domestic
crop and sell it profitably when the market becomes flooded with
cheap American imports. This drives the farmers out of business and
eventually off their land and into the growing slums of urban
centers, where they join the ranks of the un- or underemployed and
hungry. I don't know how to solve this issue, because there are real
hunger needs out there, but most of it has to do with getting supply
to the right places, not with producing more. We certainly need to do
more to support and stimulate local crop production, not imported
food supplies.
The corporations pushing GMOs say that
these new crops will allow greater harvests, but we don't need larger
harvests here in North America. We're already overproducing staples
and farmers can't make money off them as it is. Nor do farmers in
developing countries need GMOs because they cannot begin to afford
pricey GM seed, nor the fertilizers and pesticides necessary for
industrialized agriculture. In most situations they have suitable
local crops. They just need the ability to get that crop to a
suitable market and receive a fair wage for their product.
Related to this issue is that the
increase in GM farming adds to an already alarming trend toward
eliminating diversty in the global food supply. Instead of 100
varieties of a particular crop, we may now have only 20, or 10, or
even less. (The film gives some specific examples which I do not have
at hand at the moment.) With less genetic variety each crop becomes
more susceptible to disease and pests, which means we are at greater
risk of major crop failure, not less. When these GM seeds are
introduced into developing countries, they can cross breed and dilute
or even eliminate local varieties of crops that may be far better
suited to the local environment. And let's not forget that according
to US and Canadian law, if a GM plant does cross pollinate with
another, the resulting seed would belong to the corporation holding
the patent for the GMO, not the local farmer. Can you see a problem
here? Rather than helping local farmers in developing countries,
rather than reducing or eliminating global hunger, the growing use of
GMOs actually carries a significant possibility of increasing it.
One final comment for today. The
corporations that are developing GMOs have now put a rider on an
agricultural bill before Congress that would require the Department
of Agriculture and other government agencies to allow the use of GMOs
without question upon the request of any of these corporations. No
safety reviews. No peer-reviewed studies. No independent testing.
This is bad news for the farmers and consumers of this country. Take
a moment to read about it and then sign this petition or
contact your own congressional representatives and senators and tell
them to oppose this rider.
No comments:
Post a Comment